• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Youtube
  • News & Articles
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • Pay Online
1-800-243-5353 | 250-542-5353
Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Our Team
    • Our Lawyers
    • Our History
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • General Litigation
    • Insurance and Health Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Real Estate
    • Wills and Estates
  • Careers
    • Lawyer Careers
    • Articling Student Careers
    • Support Staff Careers
    • Apply Online
  • Community
    • In the Community
    • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Rear Ended While Stopped in Traffic Results in $89,000.00 Claim

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A young man from North Vancouver was injured when he was rear ended while stopped in traffic. He suffered soft tissue injuries which required several months of physiotherapy and he missed some days of work. Mr. Yawney resolved his claim without a trial for $89,000.00 including costs.

April 11, 2016
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2016-04-11 00:00:002016-04-11 00:00:00Rear Ended While Stopped in Traffic Results in $89,000.00 Claim

Managing Business Risk: Use Employment Agreements

Business Law, Blog

Written by Andrew Powell, Partner

From an employer’s perspective, employees are a necessary evil.  A growing business cannot exist without employees, but it is vital for any business owner to remember that employees are not invested in the business that employs them.  Employees are not owners.  The relationship of employers to employees is very much a contractual one.  Employees provide a service in exchange for money, so in a very real sense, the business is the customer of the employee.
The employment relationship constitutes a very special type of contract.  Although for many purposes at law employees are differentiated from independent contractors, they are in fact in a contract with their employer.  What makes the employment contract a little unique is that many of its terms are imposed by law – either under legislation such as the Employment Standards Act (for non-union workers) and the Workers Compensation Act, or because of common law principles that affect the employer-employee relationship.  In either case, many of these terms of an employment arrangement may not be understood or even be known by either party. For this reason, when an employment relationship breaks down, there may be liabilities faced by employers that were unexpected and for which the employer may well be completely unprepared. 
A typical example, frequently litigated, is the calculation of severance pay.  Severance pay is an amount of money paid to a worker who has been dismissed without cause, and it is intended to cover that employee’s lost wages for enough time for that employee to reasonably be able to find similar employment.  Generally, it is assumed that an employee will become more secure, more specialized, and more highly-compensated the longer that he or she occupies a position, so they will require more time to find equivalent positions if they are let go.  Longer-term employees require longer notice periods, and consequently higher severance payments in lieu of that notice period.
Under s.63 of the Employment Standards Act, the employer’s liability for severance is one week’s wages after three months of employment, two week’s wages after twelve months of employment, and an additional one week’s wages per year of employment up to a maximum of 8 week’s wages.
Case law in British Columbia, however, has put quite a different light on the amount of appropriate severance pay.  Although each case is determined individually, it would be more accurate to say that an employer’s real liability is closer to one month’s wages per year of service, to a maximum of about 24 months.  This is a significantly greater liability than the one offered by the Employment Standards Act, and in the absence of a written employment contract, it is likely the one that will govern.  A very important way to limit liability for severance pay, then, is to have a written employment agreement in place that confines severance pay to the amount set out in the Employment Standards Act. 
Employment agreements can do much to help provide certainty and security in a number of ways, and can help cover exposure in areas that employers never anticipate being contentious until after the employment relationship breaks down and a dismissal becomes necessary for the business.  Employment agreements can not only limit severance pay, they can define workplace responsibilities, determine compensation, and can even set out circumstances where employees can be dismissed without notice or severance pay.  They can be tailored to any business or individual circumstance, and can be a very significant legal tool that a company can use to manage the consequences of its business decisions and take control of its own risk.

April 11, 2016
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2016-04-11 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:45Managing Business Risk: Use Employment Agreements

Are Gifts Given to your Child Also Gifts to your Child’s Spouse When They Split?

Blog

Written by Kylie Walman, Associate

Cabezas v. Maxim, 2015 BCCA 82 – Chiasson, Garson, Goepel, J.J.A.
In BC, gifts given to one spouse by a third party (like a parent) are not considered family property and the spouse who received the gift keeps it when the couple splits.  But what happens when the other spouse says the gift was also intended for him/her – particularly where the gift is payments made on the couples’ mortgage by one of their parents?  That was the question for the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Cabezas v. Maxim, 2015 BCCA 82, released on February 25, 2016.
In Cabezas, Mr. Maxim’s mother made substantial mortgage payments to pay off the couple’s home – which was in joint names.  The parties sold the home after they split and the issue of the mortgage payments was important to determine how much each party would get out of the sale of the home.  Mr. Maxim argued that the mortgage payments were gifts to him alone – as an advance on his inheritance – and he should get back all of that money.  Ms. Cabezas argued that the payments were gifts to both of them and the sale proceeds should be divided equally. 
The Court held that the intention of the parents at the time the gift was given is what matters in deciding whether the daughter-in-law should benefit.  Although Mr. Maxim’s mother testified that she intended the payments to be an advance on her son’s inheritance, the Court didn’t accept that evidence.  Instead, the court noted that the house was in both names; Mr. Maxim’s mother didn’t say the gift was for her son alone; and she gave similar gifts to her other children and their spouses.  So, at the time of the gift, the court found that Mr. Maxim’s mother didn’t think about whether it would benefit her daughter-in-law, she simply wanted to help her son out with his expenses.  The Court concluded that the gift was for both spouses and the sale proceeds were divided equally.
 If you wish to give your adult children substantial gifts and want to keep their spouses from benefiting if the marriage breaks down – you need to ensure your intentions, at the time the gift is given, are stated clearly and in writing.

April 1, 2016
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2016-04-01 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:45Are Gifts Given to your Child Also Gifts to your Child’s Spouse When They Split?

Pages

  • Home
  • Sponsorship Application Form
  • Our Lawyers
  • Our History
  • My account
  • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • General Litigation
  • Insurance and Health Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • News & Articles
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Apply Online
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Categories

  • News
  • In the Community
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Family Law
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Blog
  • Decisions and Settlements

Archive

  • January 2025
  • October 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • December 2023
  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • February 2012

#301-2706 30th Avenue
Vernon, B.C. Canada V1T 2B6

Get Directions

Hours: 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
Monday to Friday

Wheelchair Accessible

Telephone: 250-542-5353
Toll-Free: 1-800-243-5353
Fax: 250-542-7273

© Copyright - Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Pay Online
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settingsHide notification onlySettings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only