• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Youtube
  • News & Articles
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • Pay Online
1-800-243-5353 | 250-542-5353
Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Our Team
    • Our Lawyers
    • Our History
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • General Litigation
    • Insurance and Health Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Real Estate
    • Wills and Estates
  • Careers
    • Lawyer Careers
    • Articling Student Careers
    • Support Staff Careers
    • Apply Online
  • Community
    • In the Community
    • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Varying the will results in an increase to 50% of the estate

Family Law, Litigation, Decisions and Settlements

A property owner died leaving a will that provided for his common law spouse to receive, from his estate, only the increase in value of his property while the two were living together.  This value amounted to a total of about 7% of the value of the man’s estate.  Andrew sued to vary the will, alleging that given the history and nature of their relationship, she was entitled to much more as the spouse of the deceased.  After a trial, the court agreed, and varied the will, increasing her share from approximately 7% to 50% of the estate.

June 27, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-27 00:00:002019-06-27 00:00:00Varying the will results in an increase to 50% of the estate

Senior struck on crosswalk resolves for over $90,000.00

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A nice lady in her late 70’s was hit on a city street while walking in a cross walk with her dog.  She suffered a hip injury that significantly disabled her for over a year. She did get back to walking her dog and being able to maintain herself and her home, but she required significant rehab assistance. Michael Yawney QC helped her arrange the rehab assistance and was able to resolve her claim without a trial for over $90,000.00.

June 26, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-26 00:00:002019-06-26 00:00:00Senior struck on crosswalk resolves for over $90,000.00

Goldie v. McLean/Kehler et al – Welder Was a Victim of Two Accidents

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Matt Goldie was referred to James by a former client.  Initially he was involved in a serious rear-end collision accident which caused him significant disability in his low back.  At the time of this first accident, Matt was working in construction and took almost two months off of work before returning to this heavy manual labour job.  Upon returning to work, he discovered that he had excruciating pain in his low back, which greatly affected his ability to continue with the construction work.  He managed to continue with his work but was limited in his physical abilities as he had to be very careful with his low back.  James represented Matt and had set the matter down for a trial when unfortunately Matthew was involved in a second accident, which this time was a head-on collision.  At this stage, Matthew was training as a welder, and this second accident severely set Matt back in terms of his ability to work and to continue with his training.  The cumulative effect of both accidents caused him to be less able to be productive and efficient as a welder.  While the accidents did not prevent him from working as a welder, they had the potential of limiting the length of his career and limiting the available employment opportunities that might have existed absent the accidents.  ICBC did not provide what James considered a reasonable offer and so this matter went to a two-week trial in March of 2019.  Ryan Irving (Partner) was co-counsel with James in conducting the trial.  ICBC took the position that Matthew’s low back pain was not connected to his first accident because there was a delay in his discovering his back pain after the first accident.  The trial judge found that this was in fact an injury caused by the first accident based in part by the expert testimony of a spine specialist retained by James who assessed Matt.  At the end of the day the judge awarded over $400,000.00 to Matt for his losses arising from these two accidents.

PDF: Goldie_v._McLean.pdf

June 18, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-18 10:56:222023-01-20 14:24:57Goldie v. McLean/Kehler et al – Welder Was a Victim of Two Accidents

T-bone collison claim mediated for over $200,000.00 before trial

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Michael Yawney QC was asked to help a middle aged man on disability that was involved in a t-bone collision with a young driver that had pulled onto Hwy 97 in front of their vehicle. The young driver did not have the right of way and his sudden action caused a significant collision.  The man suffered a broken leg and a concussion in the collision. Mr. Yawney assisted the family with arranging occupational therapy, physio, in home care and other services. With this help the man made a significant recovery from his injuries. The claim was resolved after mediation before trial for over $200,000.00 plus costs.

June 15, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-15 00:00:002019-06-15 00:00:00T-bone collison claim mediated for over $200,000.00 before trial

Mediation results in resolved claim amounting to $450,000.00

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A physiotherapist from the North Okanagan referred a university student to Michael Yawney QC to help her with a claim for soft tissue injuries suffered in a motor vehicle collision with an out of province vehicle.  The young lady had to endure physical pain and limitation while trying to complete her university studies, including a Master degree course of studies.  Although she recovered to some extent, she had some permanent limitations in terms of her activities.  Mr. Yawney was able to resolve her claim after mediation for $450,000.00.

June 12, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-12 00:00:002019-06-12 00:00:00Mediation results in resolved claim amounting to $450,000.00

Indian Act & common law result in case being dismissed

Family Law, Litigation, Decisions and Settlements

The Deceased, a member of the Okanagan Indian Band, left a will dividing the residue of his estate between five people, some of whom were not members of the Band.  Part of the estate consisted of interests in properties within the Okanagan Indian Reserve.  The beneficiaries reached an agreement between themselves providing for the sharing of income generated from the Reserve properties.  After many years, disputes arose between the member and non-member beneficiaries, and the member beneficiaries were sued for breaching the agreement.  Andrew Powell, with Tom Christensen, argued successfully that the agreement was void and unenforceable for offending the Indian Act and the common law, resulting in the case against their clients being dismissed.
Casimir v. Parker, 2019 BCSC 939 (June 12, 2019)

June 12, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-12 00:00:002019-06-12 00:00:00Indian Act & common law result in case being dismissed

Out of province insurer pays $1,050,000.00 to settle claim

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A woman in her early 40’s was referred to Michael Yawney QC to assist her with an injury claim resulting from a collision on Hwy 97 north of Vernon where a truck and trailer from Ontario pulled onto the highway in front of the woman’s vehicle, without warning and without the right of way.  The resulting collision caused the woman’s car to become air borne and roll over. She thought she was going to die. She suffered a mild brain injury and soft tissue injuries in the collision, as well as PTSD. Driving was difficult after the collision.  Mr. Yawney was able to convince the out of province insurer to admit liability and to resolve the claim months before trial for $1,050,000.00 including costs. He also assisted the woman in obtaining her own insurance coverage for accident benefits, and secure medical and rehab payments under that policy going forward.

June 5, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-05 00:00:002019-06-05 00:00:00Out of province insurer pays $1,050,000.00 to settle claim

The Ironically Named “Minor Injury Cap”

Personal Injury, Litigation, Blog

As of April 1, 2019 the BC NDP government has brought into force legislative changes to the way motor vehicle accident claims are handled in British Columbia.
Under our old civil law system a person injured in a motor vehicle accident was entitled to claim for losses he/she suffered due to the negligence of the other driver.  This included damages for pain and suffering, income loss and rehabilitation expenses.  This concept has been around for hundreds of years and is focused on making the victim “whole.”  Each aspect of the victims claimed loss had to be proven based on the rules of evidence.  The majority of such claims would settle / resolve prior to going to trial on a compromised basis.  In fact, the majority of claims were so small that they would resolve directly between the accident victim and the insurance adjuster without any involvement of lawyers at all. 
This system was effective and fair for most years and ICBC was profitable.  It was a cash cow for many BC governments who sucked billions of dollars out of the company into general tax revenues.  In the recent past, in part due to mismanagement within ICBC, losses began to pile up.  The NDP has blamed personal injury lawyers for this sad state of affairs.  This has given the NDP government a reason to put into effect massive changes, influenced by the bureaucrats running ICBC.
This new program, effective as of April 1, 2019, has been masterfully marketed as a new system to process just the “minor claims” effectively and without the need for lawyers.  Such minor claims can only receive a maximum of $5,500.00 for pain and suffering.  Any other claimed losses associated with the minor injury would be decided by an online adjudicator, without an in person hearing and no set rules of evidence. 
On learning of the details of this new online means of “rough justice” for minor claims, I would suspect most people wouldn’t be too alarmed.  After all, this only applies to minor claims.  How much loss and damage could arise from an accident where the victim has suffered bruising or a sprain or slight whiplash that has resolved after a few months?  I would suspect public sentiment supports that such minor claims should be resolved online and free up our courts for more substantial claims that deserve our full justice system.  It all sounds reasonable…
Well here is where the masterful marketing comes in.  What is being promoted to BC citizens as a “minor injury cap” system, is really a means to prevent 80% of all BC motor vehicle accident claims from proceeding to our civil courts.  In other words ALMOST EVERYTHING IS A MINOR INJURY!  The new legislation is difficult to decipher, but it appears to define a minor injury as; any abrasion, contusion, laceration, sprain or strain; pain syndrome; or any psychological or psychiatric condition; unless it can be shown that that condition has resulted in a serious impairment or permanent serious disfiguration.  A serious impairment means that the condition lasts greater than 12 month; that the accident victim cannot do the essential tasks of employment or study (despite accommodation); and the condition is not expected to improve substantially.  The legislation also identifies any whiplash injury, TMJ (jaw) injury, or a concussion (that does not result in incapacity) as being automatically a minor injury.
Based on the above definition of minor injury, it would appear that there will be very few injuries that do not meet that definition.  Most injuries will heal within 12 months, and it is the continuing chronic pain that is so disabling and interfering in victims’ lives.   For instance, if you have a chronic pain syndrome arising from soft tissue injuries received in an accident, (not whiplash as those are automatically considered minor) even if those injuries continue well past 12 months, it will be considered minor if your employer can accommodate you at work.  It will also be considered minor if your doctor is of the view that in the future through rehabilitation, there will be improvement.  In my experience as a personal injury lawyer for over 20 years, most injuries that have resulted in a chronic pain syndrome would allow the accident victim to still perform some of his / her work duties, (albeit pain) and typically have a prognosis that the condition may improve in the future through various recommended attempts at rehabilitation.  Such injuries can be devastating for people and can last a very long time.  Under this new regime, such claims will be considered minor.  In fact most claims will be categorized as such.  This will mean that such accident victims will be subject to the online adjudication through what is called the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), and will not be able to seek fair compensation through our courts.  This is a massive change which B.C. public is currently unaware.
Unfortunately, this system of “minor injury caps” is a prime example of government double speak.  The government will say that this new regime that is now in place since April 1, 2019 only applies to minor injuries, what they haven’t told you is that…ALMOST EVERYTHING IS A MINOR INJURY!
 
James Cotter has been a trial lawyer for over 23 years, practicing in Personal Injury, Wills & Estates Litigation, Civil Litigation, Municipal and Health Law.

May 24, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-05-24 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:43The Ironically Named “Minor Injury Cap”

UBCO graduate who suffered physical impairment resolves claim for over $500,000.00

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Michael Yawney QC was asked to help a young man in his mid 20’s who was injured on Hwy 97 on his way to celebrating his graduation from UBCO.  A vehicle turned onto the highway from a side road without looking, right in front of the young man requiring him to take evasive action and forcing him off of the highway.  He suffered a serious ankle injury, as well as a concussion and soft tissue injuries.  The concussion and soft tissue injuries resolved, however, his ankle was permanently impaired. Mr. Yawney resolved his claim shortly before trial for over $500,000.00 plus costs and future rehab expenses.

May 21, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-05-21 00:00:002019-05-21 00:00:00UBCO graduate who suffered physical impairment resolves claim for over $500,000.00

What happens to my pets?

Wills and Estates, Blog

Recently, the Public Guardian and Trustee’s Office, a provincial government agency, contacted friends who operate Freedom’s Gate Equine Rescue Society to ask them to take in and rehome several horses that were owned by a person who had passed away.  What this call means to me, as a lawyer, is that the deceased died without leaving a Will, had no real family members who were willing or able to help with the estate and did not make provisions for the horses in the case of death. 
A Will is the legal document in which you appoint someone to look after your assets and ultimately distribute them to your beneficiaries after you die.  In it, you name the person who should be in charge of your estate (your Executor, also now known as your Personal Representative), and you set out who gets your assets, including real estate, personal effects, bank accounts and even your livestock and pets.  If you die without a Will, any family member could apply to be the person in charge (Administrator or Personal Representative) and provincial legislation sets out where your assets will go.  If you are married, your spouse does NOT have the automatic right to handle or receive your estate.  In the case I mentioned above involving the horses, the deceased apparently had no family members to help with these tasks, so the Public Guardian and Trustee had to become involved in managing the estate and dealing with the assets. 
In a Will, my clients typically name an executor, an alternate, a guardian for their underage children, and list of beneficiaries who will receive their estate.  In a situation where someone dies leaving a spouse and/or children, or perhaps other family members (such as siblings, if not married), my clients will often name one or more of those family members in a Will as Executor.  If they die without a Will, those family members may be willing to step up and become the Administrator.  The Executor or Administrator applies to the Court to be approved and appointed as the Executor or Administrator.  Once appointed, they have the full power and authority to sell or distribute the deceased’s assets. 
About 25 years ago, I was encouraged by my veterinarian to put clauses in Wills about pets, as she was tired of family members bringing them to her to be euthanized….perfectly healthy dogs and cats that family did not want.  It started with a generic clause directing the Executor to give Fluffy to such and such a family member or to find a good home for them, preferably with family or a friend.  However, our pets and livestock cannot wait for a Will to be located and the court appointment process to occur.  They need to be cared for immediately.  If someone has animals, they should try to arrange in advance for someone to feed and water their pets at the very least. 
If the deceased ran a business involving animals (such as dog training or horse boarding), it is essential that arrangements be made for someone to look after those animals, to contact owners to offer them the choice to make alternative arrangements for their pets, and to respond to business calls.  Hopefully, where there is a business involved, the deceased made arrangements for someone knowledgeable in the business to help out immediately. 
Instructions regarding pets can be very detailed and are best not left in a Will.  Your Will should state where your assets are to go, but it should not contain practical concerns such as what type of food Fluffy prefers and how often you feed her.  In the case of pets, it is often better to leave those detailed instructions in a letter to your executor to be kept with your Will or with a copy of your Will where you keep your important papers at home.  Better yet, if your Executor is a family member or friend, give them a copy of these instructions from time to time, so they know exactly what to do without delay and who to contact about your animals. 
I have a client who is the perfect example of the worst case scenario.  She has no spouse and no family (her parents and siblings are deceased).  She had no children, but many furbabies, such as dogs, cats, and horses.  I have helped her do her Will, with basic instructions as to the sale and distribution of her assets to distant relatives and charities.  Aside from her Will, she has been working on a list of information about her assets and pets that will come in very handy for her Executor – everything from who to call at her bank, her account numbers, her various club and association memberships, who gets certain personal effects and art work, a short history of each pet, feeding instructions, who to call about certain registered pets and how to deal with her rescued animals. 
When you are dealing with live beings, you need to make sure someone is available immediately.   Even without the formal court appointment, the Executor is permitted to attend to those matters that are necessary after someone dies – such as arranging a service, securing their home, cancelling unnecessary utilities, caring for pets and livestock, among other things.  Your Executor will need to know plenty of information about you that is not normally set out in a Will.  This equally applies to the person you appoint by Power of Attorney to handle your financial affairs if you are injured or ill.
Without a Will, her assets will not be managed by the appropriate person and they will not go to those relatives and charities that she prefers.  With a little bit of work in advance, she can rest easy, knowing that her assets will be properly distributed and her furbabies will be well cared for in loving homes. 

Leanne Rutley has been a lawyer for 30 years and practices with the firm of Nixon Wenger LLP in Vernon, BC.  She has extensive experience dealing with the administration of estates and the care of furbabies.  She is also a Director/Foster Mom for Colour Me Canine Rescue Society.  

May 9, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-05-09 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:43What happens to my pets?
Page 4 of 16«‹23456›»

Pages

  • Home
  • Sponsorship Application Form
  • Our Lawyers
  • Our History
  • My account
  • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • General Litigation
  • Insurance and Health Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • News & Articles
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Apply Online
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Categories

  • News
  • In the Community
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Family Law
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Blog
  • Decisions and Settlements

Archive

  • January 2025
  • October 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • December 2023
  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • February 2012

#301-2706 30th Avenue
Vernon, B.C. Canada V1T 2B6

Get Directions

Hours: 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
Monday to Friday

Wheelchair Accessible

Telephone: 250-542-5353
Toll-Free: 1-800-243-5353
Fax: 250-542-7273

© Copyright - Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Pay Online
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settingsHide notification onlySettings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only