• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Youtube
  • News & Articles
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • Pay Online
1-800-243-5353 | 250-542-5353
Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Our Team
    • Our Lawyers
    • Our History
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Employment Law
    • Family Law
    • General Litigation
    • Insurance and Health Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Real Estate
    • Wills and Estates
  • Careers
    • Lawyer Careers
    • Articling Student Careers
    • Support Staff Careers
    • Apply Online
  • Community
    • In the Community
    • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Executors

Wills and Estates, Family Law, Business Law, Blog

In your will, the executor is the person you name to settle your estate after your death. The executor is responsible for, among other things, determining what your assets and liabilities are at the time of your death, safeguarding those assets until they are distributed to the beneficiaries, paying your debts and filing your tax returns. They are also required to gather information about your beneficiaries and family members, including confirming legal names and addresses and identifying anyone under the age of 19. Your executor will apply for a grant of probate if one is required and ultimately distribute your assets according to your wishes.
It is important to choose your executor carefully to make sure your estate is settled efficiently and effectively. An ideal executor is someone who is organized, will deal with your assets and relatives objectively, and has loads of patience. Having an executor who lives in the same area as you is helpful but not necessary. It is also important that your executor survives you and has capacity at the time your will comes into effect.
Before appointing someone as your executor in your will, it is good practice to confirm that he or she is able and willing to take on that role. An alternate executor should be appointed in case the first executor can’t act.
There are a few circumstances where the intended executorship might fail:
1.    If you die before you have prepared a will, it is called dying intestate. The court must appoint someone to administer your estate. The court will look to who has the most interest in the estate – typically your closest surviving family member. (For more information on dying intestate, see Dying Without a Will

2.    If the executor named in your will declines, dies or is incapable of taking on the role, and you have no surviving or willing alternate executors, the court must appoint someone to administer your estate in accordance with your will. This person might not be permitted to act as administrator without posting an estate bond to protect creditors and beneficiaries who minors or incapable in the event the estate assets are administered improperly.

3.    If your sole or last surviving executor (“Your Last Executor”) received a grant of probate and then becomes incapable or dies before finishing his or her duties, the executor appointed by Your Last Executor in his or her will may be in a position to take over the administration of your estate. This is called the “chain of executorship” and it will not apply to all cases where Your Last Executor can no longer act before the administration of the estate is completed.

4.    The chain of executorship is broken if Your Last Executor left no will or did not appoint an executor or has no surviving willing and able executors. In those circumstances, the person with the most interest in your estate – typically a beneficiary – can apply to be substituted as the administrator of your estate.
Be sure to review your will regularly and be aware of the health and personal circumstances of your primary and alternate executors. If one or all of your executors are no longer able to act, make arrangements to update your will.

Krystin Kempton is a Partner at Nixon Wenger LLP where she has a general solicitor’s practice, advising corporate and individual clients on corporate and commercial transactions, lending and borrowing, wills and estates and real estate matters.
 

August 2, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-08-02 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:42Executors

Claim resolves for $85,000.00 plus costs & future rehabilitation expenses

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Michael Yawney QC was retained by an aboriginal man and his wife for a head on collision in winter conditions on Hwy 97 north of Vernon.  The man suffered soft tissue injuries that required hospitalization. Liability for the collision was admitted. The claim was resolved prior to trial for $85,000.00 plus costs and plus future rehab expenses. The man had substantially recovered, however, he required ongoing physiotherapy and medications to assist him in managing his symptoms.

July 19, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-07-19 00:00:002019-07-19 00:00:00Claim resolves for $85,000.00 plus costs & future rehabilitation expenses

Avoid Probate Fees

Wills and Estates, Family Law, Business Law, Blog

Probate fees are fees paid to the province to obtain a Grant of Probate from the British Columbia Supreme Court when a person dies. The fee is based on the value of the deceased person’s assets and can be generally estimated at 1.4% of the value of the assets. There are some adjustments, but the 1.4% provides a small overestimate of the fee. A Grant of Probate is generally required to enable the Executor to sell or otherwise deal with the deceased person`s assets.

However, not all of a person`s assets while alive may form part of that person`s estate and require a Grant of Probate to enable transfer. For example, an RRSP, RRIF, or TFSA that designates a beneficiary who survives the deceased person, will transfer directly to that beneficiary and not form part of the deceased`s estate that is subject to probate. Life insurance naming a beneficiary will go to the named beneficiary and not become part of the estate. And assets that are owned with one or more other persons as joint tenants can pass to the surviving joint tenants rather than to the estate.

Owning assets as joint tenants is a common circumstance for spouses. Most couples will own their home as joint tenants, have joint bank accounts, and often own vehicles jointly. For most couples*, it makes sense to also name the spouse as beneficiary for life insurance, RRSPs, RRIFs, and TFSAs. Consequently, upon the death of one spouse, all assets may transfer to the surviving spouse without the need to obtain a Grant of Probate.

Given the savings of time and money in avoiding a need for probate when the first spouse dies, we find that many surviving spouses are interested in adding children to title to a home or recreational property, or to bank accounts, in an effort to avoid future probate fees. While that can be effective to avoid probate, the transfer of ownership has many consequences that may not be intended.

Adding another person to title, or to a bank account, is a transfer of ownership. If the asset were a recreational property or an investment account, the transfer will be a disposition for income tax purposes and may trigger an obligation to pay capital gains tax. If you add a child to title to your principal residence and that child does not live in the residence, capital gains tax could become payable on part of the future increase in value of the home as part of the principal residence exemption may be lost. Once ownership is changed, control is lost, such that any future decision regarding a home or recreational property, including whether or not to sell or mortgage it, will require agreement of all owners. The asset would also be at risk of a claim by any creditors of the person that was added as an owner as well as claims by that person’s spouse in a family law claim.

Notwithstanding the consequences of adding a joint owner to an asset, there are circumstances where it is a good planning option. It is most important to clearly understand both the intended and unintended consequences of any change of ownership of any asset, and to clearly document the intent of any change. If one child is added to a bank account, should the balance of that account go to that child upon your death or do you intend that the balance be split among all your children. Future disputes can be avoided or minimized if intentions are well documented. A failure to properly document intentions often results in lengthy disputes that are expensive and permanently damage family relationships.

Probate fees are significant enough that it makes sense to at least consider options to avoid the need to obtain a grant of probate. But any changes in ownership should only be undertaken after careful consideration of the consequences of such change within the context of a person`s overall estate plan, and taking into account family dynamics that may create greater risks. All of these factors require a good conversation with your legal advisor to ensure any effort to save probate fees does not create problems that will be much more expensive and damaging to address.

*There are exceptions as each family is unique. You should seek legal advice that reflects your individual circumstances when planning for the eventual disposition of your assets upon death.

Tom Christensen, Q.C., has a general solicitor’s practice, assisting clients with business matters, wills and incapacity planning, the administration of estates, and real estate conveyancing and financing matters. He has a particular interest in assisting families with the transition of assets from one generation to the next through effective personal and business succession planning as well as resolving estate disputes outside of court.

July 12, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-07-12 00:00:002021-02-19 00:24:42Avoid Probate Fees

Varying the will results in an increase to 50% of the estate

Family Law, Litigation, Decisions and Settlements

A property owner died leaving a will that provided for his common law spouse to receive, from his estate, only the increase in value of his property while the two were living together.  This value amounted to a total of about 7% of the value of the man’s estate.  Andrew sued to vary the will, alleging that given the history and nature of their relationship, she was entitled to much more as the spouse of the deceased.  After a trial, the court agreed, and varied the will, increasing her share from approximately 7% to 50% of the estate.

June 27, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-27 00:00:002019-06-27 00:00:00Varying the will results in an increase to 50% of the estate

Senior struck on crosswalk resolves for over $90,000.00

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A nice lady in her late 70’s was hit on a city street while walking in a cross walk with her dog.  She suffered a hip injury that significantly disabled her for over a year. She did get back to walking her dog and being able to maintain herself and her home, but she required significant rehab assistance. Michael Yawney QC helped her arrange the rehab assistance and was able to resolve her claim without a trial for over $90,000.00.

June 26, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-26 00:00:002019-06-26 00:00:00Senior struck on crosswalk resolves for over $90,000.00

Goldie v. McLean/Kehler et al – Welder Was a Victim of Two Accidents

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Matt Goldie was referred to James by a former client.  Initially he was involved in a serious rear-end collision accident which caused him significant disability in his low back.  At the time of this first accident, Matt was working in construction and took almost two months off of work before returning to this heavy manual labour job.  Upon returning to work, he discovered that he had excruciating pain in his low back, which greatly affected his ability to continue with the construction work.  He managed to continue with his work but was limited in his physical abilities as he had to be very careful with his low back.  James represented Matt and had set the matter down for a trial when unfortunately Matthew was involved in a second accident, which this time was a head-on collision.  At this stage, Matthew was training as a welder, and this second accident severely set Matt back in terms of his ability to work and to continue with his training.  The cumulative effect of both accidents caused him to be less able to be productive and efficient as a welder.  While the accidents did not prevent him from working as a welder, they had the potential of limiting the length of his career and limiting the available employment opportunities that might have existed absent the accidents.  ICBC did not provide what James considered a reasonable offer and so this matter went to a two-week trial in March of 2019.  Ryan Irving (Partner) was co-counsel with James in conducting the trial.  ICBC took the position that Matthew’s low back pain was not connected to his first accident because there was a delay in his discovering his back pain after the first accident.  The trial judge found that this was in fact an injury caused by the first accident based in part by the expert testimony of a spine specialist retained by James who assessed Matt.  At the end of the day the judge awarded over $400,000.00 to Matt for his losses arising from these two accidents.

PDF: Goldie_v._McLean.pdf

June 18, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-18 10:56:222023-01-20 14:24:57Goldie v. McLean/Kehler et al – Welder Was a Victim of Two Accidents

T-bone collison claim mediated for over $200,000.00 before trial

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

Michael Yawney QC was asked to help a middle aged man on disability that was involved in a t-bone collision with a young driver that had pulled onto Hwy 97 in front of their vehicle. The young driver did not have the right of way and his sudden action caused a significant collision.  The man suffered a broken leg and a concussion in the collision. Mr. Yawney assisted the family with arranging occupational therapy, physio, in home care and other services. With this help the man made a significant recovery from his injuries. The claim was resolved after mediation before trial for over $200,000.00 plus costs.

June 15, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-15 00:00:002019-06-15 00:00:00T-bone collison claim mediated for over $200,000.00 before trial

Mediation results in resolved claim amounting to $450,000.00

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A physiotherapist from the North Okanagan referred a university student to Michael Yawney QC to help her with a claim for soft tissue injuries suffered in a motor vehicle collision with an out of province vehicle.  The young lady had to endure physical pain and limitation while trying to complete her university studies, including a Master degree course of studies.  Although she recovered to some extent, she had some permanent limitations in terms of her activities.  Mr. Yawney was able to resolve her claim after mediation for $450,000.00.

June 12, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-12 00:00:002019-06-12 00:00:00Mediation results in resolved claim amounting to $450,000.00

Indian Act & common law result in case being dismissed

Family Law, Litigation, Decisions and Settlements

The Deceased, a member of the Okanagan Indian Band, left a will dividing the residue of his estate between five people, some of whom were not members of the Band.  Part of the estate consisted of interests in properties within the Okanagan Indian Reserve.  The beneficiaries reached an agreement between themselves providing for the sharing of income generated from the Reserve properties.  After many years, disputes arose between the member and non-member beneficiaries, and the member beneficiaries were sued for breaching the agreement.  Andrew Powell, with Tom Christensen, argued successfully that the agreement was void and unenforceable for offending the Indian Act and the common law, resulting in the case against their clients being dismissed.
Casimir v. Parker, 2019 BCSC 939 (June 12, 2019)

June 12, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-12 00:00:002019-06-12 00:00:00Indian Act & common law result in case being dismissed

Out of province insurer pays $1,050,000.00 to settle claim

Personal Injury, Decisions and Settlements

A woman in her early 40’s was referred to Michael Yawney QC to assist her with an injury claim resulting from a collision on Hwy 97 north of Vernon where a truck and trailer from Ontario pulled onto the highway in front of the woman’s vehicle, without warning and without the right of way.  The resulting collision caused the woman’s car to become air borne and roll over. She thought she was going to die. She suffered a mild brain injury and soft tissue injuries in the collision, as well as PTSD. Driving was difficult after the collision.  Mr. Yawney was able to convince the out of province insurer to admit liability and to resolve the claim months before trial for $1,050,000.00 including costs. He also assisted the woman in obtaining her own insurance coverage for accident benefits, and secure medical and rehab payments under that policy going forward.

June 5, 2019
https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png 0 0 NW Admin https://www.nixonwenger.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nixon-Wenger-Logo-2.png NW Admin2019-06-05 00:00:002019-06-05 00:00:00Out of province insurer pays $1,050,000.00 to settle claim
Page 4 of 17«‹23456›»

Pages

  • Home
  • Sponsorship Application Form
  • Our Lawyers
  • Our History
  • My account
  • Paul Nixon’s Legacy
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • General Litigation
  • Insurance and Health Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Decisions and Settlements
  • News & Articles
  • Community
  • Careers
  • Apply Online
  • Contact
  • Contact – Committee Application Intake
  • Contact – Employment Litigation Intake
  • Contact – Estate Litigation Intake
  • Contact – General Litigation Intake
  • Contact – Insurance Litigation Intake
  • Pay Online
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Categories

  • Estate Litigation
  • News
  • In the Community
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Wills and Estates
  • Family Law
  • Business Law
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Blog
  • Decisions and Settlements

Archive

  • May 2026
  • January 2026
  • October 2025
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • December 2023
  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • February 2012

#301-2706 30th Avenue
Vernon, B.C. Canada V1T 2B6

Get Directions

Hours: 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
Monday to Friday

Wheelchair Accessible

Telephone: 250-542-5353
Toll-Free: 1-800-243-5353
Fax: 250-542-7273

© Copyright - Nixon Wenger LLP
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Pay Online
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settingsHide notification onlySettings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only